Ashley Graham Kennedy’s Diagnosis A guide for Medical Trainees is a practical guide to complex reasoning, observations, and judgments that health professionals draw for clinical diagnosis. Building on the cornerstone of the patient-physician relationship, this volume provides rigorous but accessible conceptual analysis to address uncertainties, the effective use of diagnostic tests, and practical strategies for understanding economic, mutual, and ethical considerations. You can download this medical book free in pdf format with a direct google drive link.
In six chapters, Ashley Graham Kennedy Cowade deals with thorny issues such as over-diagnosis, under-diagnosis, and new complications from 19 epidemics, which are supplemented by carefully selected medical case studies. In doing so, she points out that even in “normal” matters, a delicate balance of medical and ethical considerations is needed to promote the patient’s physical and mental well-being. Ultimately, this volume shows that clinical assessment is not just about gaining knowledge but also facilitating the health of those who serve it.
|Book Name||Diagnosis A Guide for Medical Trainees Free Download|
|Author of Book||Ashley Graham Kennedy|
The process of clinical diagnosis, from establishing the patient’s relationship to the physician’s relationship to gathering evidence, performing diagnostic tests, diagnosing, interpreting and allocating, to work on the patient’s condition. And while pursuing a treatment plan, the disadvantages of both over-diagnosis and under-diagnosis are, like the argument, the cornerstone of all modern medicine. Through a discussion of actual case studies, this book shows that the process of clinical diagnosis, even what is considered a general or routine case, is complex, interesting, multifaceted, and involves logic, evidence, ethics, and probability. Involves consideration. And economics. Thus, the process of clinical diagnosis is more than just basic science. Here, as in all areas of medical practice, ethics is intertwined with evidence: to be a good diagnostician requires not only an understanding of potential theory and statistical analysis but also learning to listen to your patients, diagnostic tests. Learning to interpret the results of clinical considerations, learning how to manage diagnostic uncertainty in a clinical setting, understanding the possible reasons for having a diagnostic test or not, and real patient concerns Related to the diagnostic justice issues you face.
In late June 2018, Oxford University Press contacted me to ask if I was. Medical uncertainty would be interested in writing a book on a topic. I have written many articles before. While honored by them.
Request, I told him that I would instead write a book about the practice of the medical diagnosis, a topic I had been thinking about and writing about for six years now. After completing a dissertation on scientific models and representation at the University of Virginia in 2012, I accepted a two-year postdoctoral position at the University of South Carolina to dedicate my time to the study of my newly discovered passion: philosophy of medicine. On the first day of my postage, I assigned myself the task of mapping out a plan to read all available philosophies of medical literature on medical diagnosis. I understood that since diagnosis is the starting point of medicine, it should also be the starting point of my post-doctoral studies. Five minutes later, I realized that there was basically no philosophical literature on diagnosis and no systematic assessment of the concepts involved in the patient’s diagnosis process.
What a shock! Although there was a lot of interesting work going on in the philosophy of medicine, at that time it was almost exclusively focused on the diagnosis of medical treatment. On the other hand, most of the medical literature was dedicated. On the specific question of how to assess a medical diagnosis. Cannot do diagnostic practice in the issue of heuristics and bias find a job – either philosophical or medical – that has been tested.
I started with the concepts involved in the overall diagnostic exercise. Reading, and writing, drawing these issues on its own. Scientific background and philosophical training as well as clinics. Observations at Columbia University Medical Center, while simultaneously teaching these topics to pre-medical students, medical students, and medical residents at the University of South Carolina and Florida Atlantic University.
Now, almost eight years later, this book is the result of that work.
I don’t pretend to write a book that solves all the philosophical or conceptual problems in the practice of clinical diagnosis: readers will see that there are many that I have left out. However, the topics I have chosen to address are all theoretically important and have a direct bearing on real, everyday clinical practice. While I hope what happens next. It will be of interest to all medical practitioners, medical students.
The philosopher of medicine, and the advocate of the patient, I basically have. Wrote it with an audience of medical trainees – interns, residents, And partner – in mind. That way, philosophers will see that I do. I do not always fully defend the philosophical arguments I make. Instead, I leave it to the future. I hope that after that, you will find work worth reading.
Check more Ofxord Books here
Topics of this Edition:
Chapter 1 Setting the Stage
Chapter 2 Testing
Chapter 3 Decision-Making
Chapter 4 Handling Uncertainty
Chapter 5 Avoiding Over- and Underdiagnosis
Chapter 6 Practicing Diagnostic Justice
Above are the chapters of this medical book name Diagnosis A Guide for Medical Trainees Free Download
Philosophers have been writing about the practice of medicine for some time. In particular, in recent years, philosophers of medicine have been asking and seeking to answer, questions concerning both the epistemology and the metaphysics of medical practice. Epistemology, generally speaking, is the philosophical study of the nature and extent of knowledge either globally or in a given domain, whereas metaphysics (although notoriously difficult to define) is generally understood to be the study of the fundamental nature of reality, or what it is that exists. These questions, as they pertain to medicine, are not only philosophically interesting but also practically relevant.
of the recent epistemological work in philosophy of medicine has been concerned with medical treatments and interventions, specifically with questions about efficacy, evidence, and extrapolation regarding their evaluation. Recent metaphysical inquiry in the philosophy of medicine, on the other hand, has focused primarily on the definitions of what counts as “health” versus what counts as “disease” (Engelhardt 1975; Boorse 2013). Yet both of these areas of inquiry in the philosophy of medicine have left aside, for the most part, questions concerning the clinical process of medical diagnosis and the concepts that this process involves. There is a similar gap in the medical literature. Although diagnostics, as well as heuristics and bias, are extensively discussed in this literature, very little has been written on conceptual issues in the diagnostic process as a whole.
Given the importance of the diagnostic process in modern medicine, these gaps are both significant and surprising, especially because diagnosis is the starting point of the clinical encounter. In fact, before the treatment or prognostic evaluation of a patient can even begin, there must be at least a working diagnosis (and preferably an accurate one). Thus, a critical examination of the diagnostic process, and its prominent role in medical practice, seems to be well worth the effort. This book is meant to begin to address these gaps in the medical and philosophical literature by engaging with some of the most important and overarching conceptual issues in the practice of clinical diagnosis.
Conceptual issues pertaining to diagnostic practice can be roughly divided into those that concern diagnostic reasoning and those that concern diagnostic testing. Both types of issues are discussed in this book. Furthermore, the methodology that you will find in what follows is an extension of the analytical methods of the current philosophy of science and philosophy of medicine. These methods of analysis are not new, but what is new are the questions that I use these methods to address. These questions concern evidence, ethics, and justice as they relate to both diagnostic reasoning and diagnostic testing in the clinical setting. My own reasons for studying and writing on the diagnostic process are not only academic but also personal. In my early twenties, I became seriously ill and was misdiagnosed, and therefore untreated, for many years. This experience was the cause not only of my genuine intellectual curiosity about diagnostic reasoning and testing in It never hurts to remind ourselves that medicine is always about real people with real experiences, and we should therefore not only study it but also aim to improve it, in whatever ways we can.
Download this free book for doctors trainees who want to become a doctor. Ashley Graham Kennedy’s Diagnosis A guide for Medical Trainees will be helpful in the initial stage.
Keep learning and sharing